Sagittal balance in sitting and standing positions: A systematic review of radiographic measures.

Background: Sagittal imbalance can be caused by various etiologies and is among the most important indicators of spinal deformity. Sagittal balance can be restored through surgical intervention based on several radiographic measures. The purpose of this study is to review the normal parameters in the sitting position, which are not well understood and could have significant implications for non-ambulatory patients. Methods: A systematic review was performed adhering to PRISMA Guidelines. Using R-software, the weighted means and 95% confidence intervals of the radiographic findings were calculated using a random effect model and significance testing using unpaired t-tests. Results: 10 articles with a total of 1066 subjects reported radiographic measures of subjects with no spinal deformity in the sitting and standing position. In the healthy individual, standing sagittal vertical axis -16.8°was significantly less than sitting 28.4° (p < 0.0001), while standing lumbar lordosis 43.3°is significantly greater than sitting 21.3° (p < 0.0001). Thoracic kyphosis was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.368). Standing sacral slope 34.3° was significantly greater than sitting 19.5° (p < 0.0001) and standing pelvic tilt 14.0° was significantly less than sitting 33.9° (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: There are key differences between standing and sitting postures, which could lead to undue stress on surgical implants and poor outcomes, especially for non-ambulatory populations. There is a need for more studies reporting sitting and standing radiographic measures in different postures and spinal conditions.

The ClearPoint Array Frame: An MRI Compatible System that Supports Non-craniotomy, Multi-trajectory (NCMT) Stereotactic Procedures.

BACKGROUND: With continued evolution in stereotactic techniques and an expanding armamentarium of surgical therapeutic options, non-craniotomy stereotactic procedures in neuro-oncology are becoming increasingly complex, often requiring multi-trajectory approaches. Here we demonstrate that the ClearPoint SmartFrame Array (Solana Beach, California, USA), a second-generation magnetic resonance imaging-compatible stereotactic frame, supports such non-craniotomy, multi-trajectory (NCMT) stereotactic procedures. METHODS: We previously published case reports demonstrating the feasibility of NCMT through the ClearPoint SmartFrame Array. Here we prospectively followed the next 10 consecutive patients who underwent such multi-trajectory procedures to further establish procedural safety and clinical utility. RESULTS: Ten patients underwent complex, multi-trajectory stereotactic procedures, including combinations of needle biopsy ± cyst drainage and laser interstitial thermal therapy targeting geographically distinct regions of neoplastic lesions under the same anesthetic event. The median maximal radial error of stereotaxis was 1.0 mm. In all cases, definitive diagnosis was achieved, and >90% of the intended targets were ablated. The average stereotaxis time for the multi-trajectory procedure was 119 ± 22.2 minutes, comparing favorably to our previously published results of single-trajectory procedures (80 ± 9.59 minutes, P = 0.125). There were no procedural complications. Post-procedure, the neurologic condition of 1 patient improved, while the remaining 9 patients remained stable. All patients were discharged home, with a median hospital stay of 1 day (range: 1-12 days). With a median follow-up of 376 days (range: 155-1438 days), there were no 30-day readmissions or wound complications. CONCLUSIONS: Geographically distinct regions of brain cancer can be safely and accurately accessed through the ClearPoint Array frame in NCMT stereotactic procedures.

Optimal Frequency in Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Management of Chronic Pain: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) has been shown to be effective for pain modulation in a variety of pathological conditions causing neuropathic pain. The purpose of this study is to conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized control trials to identify the most optimal frequency required to achieve chronic pain modulation using rTMS. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in electronic databases to identify randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of rTMS for chronic pain management. A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, and a NMA was conducted to identify the most effective rTMS frequency for chronic pain management. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed that high frequency rTMS (20 Hz) was the most effective frequency for chronic pain modulation. Patients treated with 20 Hz had lower pain levels than those treated at 5 Hz (mean difference [MD] = -3.11 [95% confidence interval {CI}: -5.61 - -0.61], P = 0.032) and control (MD = -1.99 [95% CI: -3.11 - -0.88], P = 0.023). Similarly, treatment with 10 Hz had lower pain levels compared to 5 Hz (MD = -2.56 [95% CI: -5.05 - -0.07], P = 0.045) and control (MD = -1.44 [95% CI: -2.52 - -0.36], P = 0.031). 20 Hz and 10 Hz were not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: This NMA suggests that high frequency rTMS (20 Hz) is the most optimal frequency for chronic pain modulation. These findings have important clinical implications and can guide healthcare professionals in selecting the most effective frequency for rTMS treatment in patients with chronic pain.

Comparison of Gamma Knife (GK) and Linear Accelerator (LINAC) radiosurgery of brain metastasis resection cavity: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the resection cavity is essential in the treatment of brain metastasis (BM) amenable to surgical resection. The two most common platforms for SRS delivery include Gamma Knife (GK) and LINAC. Here we collated the available peer-reviewed literature and performed a meta-analysis on clinical outcomes after GK or LINAC resection cavity SRS. METHODS: Following PRISMA Guidelines, a search on PUBMED and MEDLINE was performed to include all studies evaluating each post-operative SRS modality. Local control, overall survival, radiation necrosis, and leptomeningeal disease were evaluated from the available data. A proportional meta-analysis was performed via R using the metafor package to pool the outcomes of studies and a moderator effect to assess the significance between groups. RESULTS: We identified 21 GK studies (n = 2009) and 28 LINAC studies (n = 2219). The radiosurgery doses employed were comparable between GK and LINAC studies. The pooled estimate of 1-year local control, 1-year overall survival, and risk of leptomeningeal disease were statistically comparable between GK and LINAC (81.7 v 85.8%; 61.4 v 62.7%; 10.6 v 12.5%, respectively). However, the risk of radiation necrosis (RN) was higher for LINAC resection cavity SRS (5.4% vs. 10%, p = 0.036). The volume of the resection cavity was a significant modifying factor for RN in both modalities (p = 0.007) with a 0.5% and 0.7% increase in RN risk with every 1 cm3 increase in tumor volume for GK and LINAC, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that GK and LINAC SRS of resection cavity achieve comparable 1-year local control and survival. However, resection cavity treated with GK SRS was associated with lowered RN risk relative to those treated with LINAC SRS.

Diagnostic predictive values for sport-related concussions: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Sport-related concussions (SRCs) can cause significant neurological symptoms, and approximately 10%-15% of athletes with SRC experience a prolonged recovery. Given the lack of visible injury on brain imaging and their varied presentations, concussions can be difficult to diagnose. A variety of tests and examination methods have been used to elicit a concussion diagnosis; however, the sensitivity and specificity of these tests are variable. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of standardized tests and visible signs like balance and vision changes in the diagnosis of SRC. METHODS: A PRISMA-adherent systematic review of concussion diagnostic examinations was performed using the PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases on December 1, 2022. Search terms included "concussion," "traumatic brain injury," "diagnosis," "sensitivity," and "specificity." Each method of examination was categorized into larger group-based symptomatologic presentations or standardized tools. The primary outcome was the diagnosis of concussion. Pooled specificity and sensitivity for each method were calculated using a meta-analysis of proportion and were hierarchically ranked using P-scores calculated from a diagnostic frequentist network meta-analysis. RESULTS: Thirty full-length articles were identified for inclusion, 13 of which evaluated grouped symptomology examinations (balance and overall clinical presentation) and 17 of which evaluated established formalized tools (ImPACT, King-Devick [K-D] Test, Sport Concussion Assessment Tool [SCAT]). The pooled specificity of the examination methods differed minimally (0.8-0.85), whereas the sensitivity varied to a larger degree (0.5-0.88). In a random effects model, the SCAT had the greatest diagnostic yield (diagnostic OR 31.65, 95% CI 11.06-90.57). Additionally, P-score hierarchical ranking revealed SCAT as having the greatest diagnostic utility (p = 0.9733), followed sequentially by ImPACT, clinical presentation, K-D, and balance. CONCLUSIONS: In deciphering which concussion symptom-focused examinations and standardized tools are most accurate in making a concussion diagnosis, the authors found that the SCAT examination has the greatest diagnostic yield, followed by ImPACT, clinical presentation, and K-D, which have comparable value for diagnosis. Given the indirect nature of this analysis, however, further comparative studies are needed to validate the findings.

Preoperative Versus Postoperative Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases: A Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: While postoperative resection cavity radiosurgery (post-SRS) is an accepted treatment paradigm for brain metastasis (BM) patients who undergo surgical resection, there is emerging interest in preoperative radiosurgery (pre-SRS) followed by surgical resection as an alternative treatment paradigm. Here, we performed a meta-analysis of the available literature on this matter. METHODS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a search of all studies evaluating pre-SRS and post-SRS was completed. Local recurrence (LR), overall survival (OS), radiation necrosis (RN), and leptomeningeal disease (LMD) were evaluated from the available data. Moderator analysis and pooled effect sizes were performed using a proportional meta-analysis with R using the metafor package. Statistics are presented as mean [95% confidence interval]. RESULTS: We identified 6 pre-SRS and 33 post-SRS studies with comparable tumor volume (4.5-17.6 cm3). There were significant differences in the pooled estimates of LR and LMD, favoring pre-SRS over post-SRS. Pooled aggregate for LR was 11.0% [4.9-13.7] and 17.5% [15.1-19.9] for pre- and post-SRS studies (P = 0.014). Similarly, pooled estimates of LMD favored pre-SRS, 4.4% [2.6-6.2], relative to post-SRS, 12.3% [8.9-15.7] (P = 0.019). In contrast, no significant differences were found in terms of RN and OS. Pooled estimates for RN were 6.4% [3.1-9.6] and 8.9% [6.3-11.6] for pre- and post-SRS studies (P = 0.393), respectively. Pooled estimates for OS were 60.2% [55.8-64.6] and 60.5% [56.9-64.0] for pre- and post-SRS studies (P = 0.974). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis supports further exploration of pre-SRS as a strategy for the treatment of BM.

Geospatial Evaluation of Disparities in Access to Cervical Spine Fusion in Metropolitan Areas Across the United States.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study with epidemiologic analysis of public Medicare data. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to use geospatial analysis to identify disparities in access to cervical spine fusions in metropolitan Medicare populations. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical spine fusion is among the most common elective procedures performed by spine surgeons and is the most common surgical intervention for degenerative cervical spine disease. Although some studies have examined demographic and socioeconomic trends in cervical spine fusion, few have attempted to identify where disparities exist and quantify them at a community level. METHODS: Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services physician billing and Medicare demographic data sets from 2013 to 2020 were filtered to contain only cervical spine fusion procedures and then combined with US Census socioeconomic data. The Moran Index geospatial clustering algorithm was used to identify statistically significant hotspot and coldspots of cervical spine fusions per 100,000 Medicare members at a county level. Univariate and multivariate analysis was subsequently conducted to identify demographic and socioeconomic factors that are associated with access to care. RESULTS: A total of 285,405 cervical spine fusions were analyzed. Hotspots of cervical spine fusion were located in the South, while coldspots were throughout the Northern Midwest, the Northeast, South Florida, and West Coast. The percent of Medicare patients that were Black was the largest negative predictor of cervical spine fusions per 100,000 Medicare members (ß=-0.13, 95% CI: -0.16, -0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to access can have significant impacts on health outcomes, and these impacts can be disproportionately felt by marginalized groups. Accounting for socioeconomic disadvantage and geography, this analysis found the Black race to be a significant negative predictor of access to cervical spine fusions. Future studies are needed to further explore potential socioeconomic barriers that exist in access to specialized surgical care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective.

Racial and gender disparities in traumatic brain injury clinical trial enrollment.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the increasing number of women and racial/ethnic minorities sustaining traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), they are underrepresented in TBI clinical trials. This study aimed to evaluate gender and racial diversity in enrolled cohorts of TBI clinical trials to identify trends and predictors of increased disparity over time. METHODS: The authors reviewed TBI clinical trials with reported results registered on the website ClinicalTrials.gov between 2008 and 2022. The studies were assessed for the proportion of women and racial/ethnic minorities enrolled as well as their reporting of race- and gender-specific characteristics such as gender ratio (GR) and Racial Diversity Index (RDI). Further study parameters, including year and duration, phase, trial design, type of funding, and trial completion, were also included. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five clinical trials met inclusion criteria, of which 65 and 134 reported race and gender, respectively. Twenty-five trials were found to have existing racial disparity (RDI < 1). Comparatively, industry-funded trials had a 26% greater likelihood of racial disparities (p = 0.026), whereas federally funded trials were 30% less likely to demonstrate racial disparities (p = 0.031). Sixty-six trials had gender disparities (GR < 0.4) present, with federally funded trials showing 37.1% greater rates of gender disparity (p < 0.001, adjusted OR 5.47, 95% CI 2.26-14.25). The impact of funding source on race and gender remained significant despite adjusting for other covariates in the multivariate analyses. Racial disparity was negatively correlated with trial completion rate (p < 0.001). Disparities were not found to improve over the 14-year time span. CONCLUSIONS: Racial and gender disparities in TBI clinical trial enrollment persist, and the lack of diversity may lead to biased evidence-based medicine. Efforts should be made to increase the representation of women and racial/ethnic minorities in TBI clinical trials to ensure equitable access to effective treatments for all populations.

Active contact proximity to the cerebellothalamic tract predicts initial therapeutic current requirement with DBS for ET: an application of 7T MRI.

Objective: To characterize how the proximity of deep brain stimulation (DBS) active contact locations relative to the cerebellothalamic tract (CTT) affect clinical outcomes in patients with essential tremor (ET). Background: DBS is an effective treatment for refractory ET. However, the role of the CTT in mediating the effect of DBS for ET is not well characterized. 7-Tesla (T) MRI-derived tractography provides a means to measure the distance between the active contact and the CTT more precisely. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 12 brain hemispheres in 7 patients at a single center who underwent 7T MRI prior to ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) DBS lead placement for ET following failed medical management. 7T-derived diffusion tractography imaging was used to identify the CTT and was merged with the post-operative CT to calculate the Euclidean distance from the active contact to the CTT. We collected optimized stimulation parameters at initial programing, 1- and 2-year follow up, as well as a baseline and postoperative Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) scores. Results: The therapeutic DBS current mean (SD) across implants was 1.8 mA (1.8) at initial programming, 2.5 mA (0.6) at 1 year, and 2.9 mA (1.1) at 2-year follow up. Proximity of the clinically-optimized active contact to the CTT was 3.1 mm (1.2), which correlated with lower current requirements at the time of initial programming (R2 = 0.458, p = 0.009), but not at the 1- and 2-year follow up visits. Subjects achieved mean (SD) improvement in tremor control of 77.9% (14.5) at mean follow-up time of 22.2 (18.9) months. Active contact distance to the CTT did not predict post-operative tremor control at the time of the longer term clinical follow up (R2 = -0.073, p = 0.58). Conclusion: Active DBS contact proximity to the CTT was associated with lower therapeutic current requirement following DBS surgery for ET, but therapeutic current was increased over time. Distance to CTT did not predict the need for increased current over time, or longer term post-operative tremor control in this cohort. Further study is needed to characterize the role of the CTT in long-term DBS outcomes.

Frequency settings of subthalamic nucleus DBS for Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's Disease. The targeted physiological structure for lead location is commonly the subthalamic nucleus (STN). The efficacy of DBS for improving motor symptoms is assessed via the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating III Scale (UPDRS-III). In this study, we sought to compare the efficacy of frequency settings utilized for STN-DBS. METHODS: Following PRISMA Guidelines, a search on PUBMED and MEDLINE was performed to include full-length randomized controlled trials evaluating STN-DBS. The frequency stimulation parameters and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) outcomes were extracted in the search. High-frequency stimulation (HFS) was defined as ≥100 Hz and low-frequency stimulation (LFS) was defined as <100 Hz. A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed with odds ratios (OR) and pooling performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Statistics are presented as OR [95% CI]. RESULTS: 15 studies consisting of 298 patients were included for analysis. Bilateral HFS -0.68 [-0.89; -0.46] was associated with better UPDRS-III scores compared to bilateral LFS. On the other hand, bilateral LFS with medications (MEDS) was favored over HFS with MEDS (-0.28 [-0.63; 0.07]). Bilateral LFS and MEDS, HFS and MEDS, stimulation (STIM) OFF MEDS ON, HFS, LFS, STIM OFF MEDS OFF UPDRS outcomes were ranked from best to worst outcomes. DISCUSSION: The outcomes of this study suggest that bilateral HFS has better utility for those with no response to medication, while LFS has additive benefits to medication by improving unique symptoms via different neurophysiological mechanisms.

WITHDRAWN: Laterality and frequency settings of subthalamic nucleus DBS for Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal.

GammaTile® (GT) as a brachytherapy platform for rapidly growing brain metastasis.

Background: A subset of brain metastasis (BM) shows rapid recurrence post-initial resection or aggressive tumor growth between interval scans. Here we provide a pilot experience in the treatment of these BM with GammaTile® (GT), a collagen tile-embedded Cesium 131 (131Cs) brachytherapy platform. Methods: We identified ten consecutive patients (2019-2023) with BM that showed either (1) symptomatic recurrence while awaiting post-resection radiosurgery or (2) enlarged by >25% of tumor volume on serial imaging and underwent surgical resection followed by GT placement. Procedural complication, 30-day readmission, local control, and overall survival were assessed. Results: For this cohort of ten BM patients, 3 patients suffered tumor progression while awaiting radiosurgery and 7 showed >25% tumor growth prior to surgery and GT placement. There were no procedural complications or 30-day mortality. All patients were discharged home, with a median hospital stay of 2 days (range: 1-9 days). 4/10 patients experienced symptomatic improvement while the remaining patients showed stable neurologic conditions. With a median follow-up of 186 days (6.2 months, range: 69-452 days), no local recurrence was detected. The median overall survival (mOS) for the newly diagnosed BM was 265 days from the time of GT placement. No patients suffered from adverse radiation effects. Conclusion: Our pilot experience suggests that GT offers favorable local control and safety profile in patients suffering from brain metastases that exhibit aggressive growth patterns and support the future investigation of this treatment paradigm.

Traumatic Brain Injury Mortality and Correlates in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Meta-Epidemiological Study.

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that up to 69 million people per year experience traumatic brain injury (TBI) with the highest prevalence found in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). A paucity of data suggests that the mortality rate after severe TBI is twice as high in LMICs than in high-income countries. OBJECTIVE: To analyze TBI mortality in LMICs and to evaluate what country-based socioeconomic and demographic parameters influence TBI outcomes. METHODS: Four databases were searched for the period January 1, 2002, to January 1, 2022, for studies describing TBI outcomes in LMICs. Multivariable analysis was performed using multivariable linear regression, with the outcome as the pooled mortality by country and the covariates as the adjusted parameters. RESULTS: Our search yielded 14 376 records of which 101 were included in the final analysis, totaling 59 197 patients and representing 31 LMICs. The pooled TBI-related mortality was 16.7% (95% CI: 13.7%-20.3%) without significant differences comparing pediatrics vs adults. Pooled severe TBI-related mortality was significantly higher than mild. Multivariable analysis showed a significant association between TBI-related mortality and median income ( P = .04), population percentage below poverty line ( P = .02), primary school enrollment ( P = .01), and poverty head ratio ( P = .04). CONCLUSION: TBI-related mortality in LMICs is 3-fold to 4-fold higher than that reported in high-income countries. Within LMICs, parameters associated with poorer outcomes after TBI include factors recognized as social determinants of health. Addressing social determinants of health in LMICs might expedite the quest to close the care delivery gap after TBI.

Beauty and death of motion.

Translational research aims to apply what we learn in the lab to the patient's care in the clinical setting. Animal studies for Parkinson's disease and Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) are particularly intriguing topics that show the value of translational research. Training a monkey to complete a task, inducing Parkinsonian symptoms, and comparing kinematic differences with various DBS settings is a transformative process of motion creation, death, and rebirth. The historical context of the drug used to induce Parkinsonian symptoms and DBS technology demonstrates how our field progresses from trial and error and evolves into enhancing patient care. We can use the same methods from animal studies to verify outcomes during a patient's DBS surgery. The narrative of one monkey demonstrates the concepts of translational research, research ethics, and medical history.

Pharmacologic and Nonpharmacologic Treatment Modalities for Bone Loss in SCI - Proposal for Combined Approach.

Increased risk of bone fracture due to bone mineral density (BMD) loss is a serious consequence of spinal cord injury (SCI). Traditionally, pharmaceutical approaches, such as bisphosphonates, have been prescribed to prevent bone loss. However, there is controversy in the literature regarding efficacy of these medications to mitigate the drastic bone loss following SCI. Individuals with SCI are particularly at risk of osteoporosis because of the lack of ambulation and weight bearing activities. In the past two decades, functional electric stimulation (FES) has allowed for another approach to treat bone loss. FES approaches are expanding into various modalities such as cycling and rowing exercises and show promising outcomes with minimal consequences. In addition, these non-pharmacological treatments can elevate overall physical and mental health. This article provides an overview of efficacy of different treatment options for BMD loss for SCI and advocates for a combined approach be pursued in standard of care.

Effect of lesion temperature on the durability of percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomies to treat trigeminal neuralgia.

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomy is a common procedure for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) that creates thermocoagulative lesions in the trigeminal ganglion. Lesioning parameters for the procedure are left to the individual surgeon's discretion, and published guidance is primarily anecdotal. The purpose of this work was to assess the role of lesioning temperature on long-term surgical outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomy from 2009 to 2020. Patient data, including demographics, disease presentation, surgical treatment, and outcomes, were collected from medical records. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of TN pain. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to assess the impact of chosen covariates on pain-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 280 patients who had undergone 464 procedures were included in the analysis. Overall, roughly 80% of patients who underwent rhizotomy would have a recurrence within 10 years. Lower lesion temperature was predictive of longer periods without pain recurrence (HR 1.05, p < 0.001). The inclusion of lesion time, postoperative numbness, prior history of radiofrequency rhizotomy, surgeon, and multiple sclerosis as confounding variables did not affect the hazard ratio or the statistical significance of this finding. Postoperative numbness and the absence of multiple sclerosis were significant protective factors in the model. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings suggest that lower lesion temperatures and, separately, postoperative numbness result in improved long-term outcomes for patients with TN who undergo percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomies. Given the limitations of retrospective analysis, the authors suggest that a prospective multisite clinical trial testing lesion temperatures would provide definitive guidance on this issue with specific recommendations about the number needed to treat and trial design.

Modern Management of Complex Tympanojugular Paragangliomas: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Tympanojugular paragangliomas (TJPs) are slow-growing tumors arising within the middle ear or jugular foramen. The development of modified skull base approaches and the increasing use of stereotactic radiosurgery have provided more modern techniques in the management of TJPs. Several factors dictating approach selection, and resulting clinical outcomes have been inconsistently described. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature describing modern management of complex TJPs was performed and summarized. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to describe the rate of tumor control, complications, and symptom improvement in patients undergoing radiosurgery or surgical resection. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were identified with a total of 852 TJP patients. A minority (153 patients) underwent radiosurgery while 699 underwent surgery. On meta-analysis, there was a 3.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5%-6.4%) tumor growth rate following radiosurgery and 3.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8%-6.0%) recurrence rate in surgical resection, with no significant moderator effect between the 2 groups (P = 0.9046). Complication rate for radiosurgery was 7.6% (95% CI: 2.8%-12.4%), differing significantly from surgical complication rates of 29.6% (95% CI: 17.1-42.0%, P = 0.0418). CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic radiosurgery and surgical resection for TJPs have similar rates of tumor recurrence. Radiation is associated with less risk and lower morbidity, yet there is comparably modest reduction of the tumor size. In sum, the data suggest that radiosurgery is a reasonable management option for patients with minimal symptoms who are high risk for surgery. Microsurgical resection should be reserved for patients with lower cranial neuropathies or those who have failed radiation treatment.

Anterior versus Posterior Ventricular Catheter Placement in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement is the mainstay of treatment for hydrocephalus, but there are relatively high rates of malfunction. Shunt catheter entry can be performed anteriorly or posteriorly, with the body of evidence from randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies suggesting conflicting findings. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed adherent to PRISMA guidelines, searching for clinical studies examining outcomes for anterior or frontal and posterior or occipital ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed on R. RESULTS: Six studies (2 randomized controlled trials and 4 retrospective cohort studies) comprising 1808 patients were identified. There were no statistically significant differences between anterior and posterior ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement for the outcomes of poor catheter placement (odds ratio [OR], 0.74; P = 0.6) and shunt infections (OR, 1.01; P = 0.9). Posterior shunts trended toward greater number of shunt revisions (OR, 0.72; P = 0.06). Six and 12 months shunt survival was comparable between anterior and posterior approaches (P > 0.05). There were significant differences between long-term shunt survival (2 and 5 years shunt survival), favoring anterior shunt placement with greater odds of survival (OR, 1.91 and OR, 1.62, respectively; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We show that although anteriorly and posteriorly placed shunts have mostly comparable outcomes, shunt survival at 2-year and 5-year intervals favors anteriorly placed shunts. Additional well-designed clinical trials are needed to validate the findings of greater late shunt failure in posteriorly placed shunts, with more time-dependent statistical measures.

Endovascular and Medical Management of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Management of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) involves minimizing expansion of the thrombus and promoting the recanalization of the venous sinus. While current guidelines include indications of endovascular management and anticoagulation with heparin and warfarin, the use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has increased. In this study, we aim to conduct a network meta-analysis comparing these 3 therapeutic options: standard anticoagulation, DOACs, and endovascular treatments (EVTs). METHODS: Seventeen of 2265 studies identified from 4 publication databases met inclusion criteria for this network meta-analysis. Outcomes analyzed included modified Rankin Scale score, complications, mortality, and 6-month recanalization rates using a frequentist network meta-analysis approach. For each outcome, the preferential order of each intervention was ranked hierarchically based on P-score calculations used for frequentist network meta-analyses. RESULTS: Modified Rankin Scale outcomes were not significantly different based on the type of treatment modality (i.e., standard anticoagulation, DOACs, or EVT). Evaluation of complications demonstrated that patients treated with EVT were significantly more likely to experience a worse outcome than individuals treated with standard anticoagulation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.83, P = 0.04). Other comparisons did not demonstrate a significant difference in adverse events. For all-cause mortality outcomes, EVT demonstrated significantly greater odds of mortality than standard anticoagulation (OR = 1.89, P = 0.02). Mortality between DOACs and standard anticoagulation was not significantly different. When comparing 6-month recanalization rates, DOACs and EVT were significantly more effective than standard anticoagulation (OR = 1.93, OR = 2.2, P < 0.05). EVT followed by DOACs was preferred over standard anticoagulation for 6-month recanalization rates. CONCLUSIONS: This network meta-analysis evaluates the outcomes in CVT treatment, comparing standard anticoagulation, DOACs, and EVT, with evidence that DOACs have similar outcomes to standard anticoagulation in the treatment of CVT. EVT resulted in an increased risk of overall mortality but improved 6-month recanalization rates.